Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | robrain's commentslogin

As someone from 1969, but with an excellent circulatory system, I just roll my eyes and look forward to the sound of bubbles bursting whilst billionaires weep.

When bubbles burst, is it really the billionaires who are hit the hardest? I'm skeptical.

Tell you what, let’s make sure this time it is!

Convince them to sink their fortunes in, and then we just make sure it pops.


What could possibly go wrong? Lame, I know, but seriously can we have some good, not sinister news for a week or two? With no AI or evil tech-bro, or senile despot overtones if possible.

What’s with the negativity? Deepmind is one of the lesser evil companies. Remember Alphafold? If there’s someone that can do something useful for humanity, it’s Demis.

As I said, I was being lame. But I get real Terminator vibes when a very good robotics company joins forces with a company that might make those robots autonomous. Terminator and Asimov robot stories make me pessimistic.

It was a knee-jerk reaction as opposed to detailed analysis.


Simplistic analysis of whether CSS sucks: this definitive guide is 1,126 pages long. On the Amazon page it also suggests the "Definitive guide to JavaScript" - it's 704 pages long.

If you can fully explain JS (an inexplicable bodge built on a tower of inexplicable bodges) in less pages then CSS almost definitely sucks.


It's a long book because of the copious visual examples.

I said it was simplistic :). Point taken.

Indeed - it’s like the last hundred years of detergent marketing: “the whitest whites ever, the gentlest wash you’ve ever experienced”. Then six months later another advance from the boffins in their lab coats. All the time it’s just soap.

Messages, select user, click the user icon to get to the info page, click Photos, Edit, Select, Download -> photos are in the Photos app and you can do what you want with them.

Not the easiest operation, but hardly jealously prevented.


Self-reply addendum - individual photos can be dealt with with a simple long-press, no need for delving into the info page for the user.

And do that individually for each of the thousands of photos? There’s no select All. Yikes.

yes, photos/camera roll is ok... if you mount an iphone as a usb device you get the DCIM/IMG_0000.jpg kind of thing.

But text messages are jealously guarded and not exportable. Apple does this for itself, not its users.


With respect - bull.

With respect, every single search query in the App Store displays advertisements by-default, and you know that.

You know you’re moving the goalposts, don’t you? I’ll grant you that the App Store and Music show ads. But that’s not what you claimed originally, is it?

Since the dawn of the current "AI" I've continued to buy and read books at the same pace. Likewise downloading interesting human-created PDFs. I know I'm not the only human who takes zero interest in the output of word-sausage extruders.


Thank you for remembering and sharing this - I knew I'd seen it before, I just couldn't recall where. Mr Scott is and was (and maybe will be?) the obligatory xkcd of nerd experiments.


Yup, Apple user since 2001, desktop and laptop, 20ish years in an office environment used for 8+ hours a day, now 5 years retired. Total faults - zero. Desire to upgrade RAM before rest of machine needed updates (eg storage+CPU+screen) - zero. Dissatisfaction with "Apple model": zero.

But... lately I've felt a hankering to run Linux as a first-class citizen rather than a VM and that's definitely a gap in Mac functionality. I wouldn't sacrifice the five years I enjoy MacOS on my machines for the ability to then move them to Linux, but it would still be nice.


I think the farther allow non-free implementations of technology to go, the harder it will be to bring us back from the brink.

We sacrifice our freedom now, because of convenience and feature sets thinking everything is going to work out in the end. In 25 years I think we are all going to look back on this moment and wish we didn't make the choices we did, myself included.


"Think “screen share, but the thing being shared is a robot writing code.”"

Thinks: why not send text instead of graphics, then? I'm sure it's more complicated than that...


Thinks: this video[1] is the processed feed from the Huygens space probe landing on Saturn's moon Titan circa 2005. Relayed through the Cassini probe orbiting Saturn, 880 million miles from the Sun. At a total mission cost of 3.25 billion dollars. This is the sensor data, altitude, speed, spin, ultra violet, and hundreds of photos. (Read the description for what the audio is encoding, it's neat!)

Look at the end of the video, the photometry data count stops at "7996 kbytes received"(!)

> "Turns out, 40Mbps video streams don’t appreciate 200ms+ network latency. Who knew. “Just lower the bitrate,” you say. Great idea. Now it’s 10Mbps of blocky garbage"

Who could do anything useful with 10Mbps. :/

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Huygens_descent.ogv


This is a great new "you can land on the moon with 10 MHz".


Yeah, I'm thinking the same thing. Capture the text somehow and send that, and reconstruct it on the other end; and the best part is you only need to send each new character, not the whole screen, so it should be very small and lightning fast?


Sounds kind of like https://asciinema.org/ (which I've never used, but it seems cool).


Which features terminal live streaming since recently released 3.0 :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: