Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more rhengles's commentslogin

One thing that always put me off about webpack is the default way it compiles your code. One of the ways is(was?) compiling code as _eval_(!!) statements and code as string. It is absolutely impossible to debug such code.

You were meant to rely on sourcemaps to get something on your debugger, but despite using the latest Chrome and developer tools at the time, I could never get it to work to actually debug sites.

I know Rollup, Vite and etc had a much easier time providing an easier developer experience because they rely on the browser's native ESM support, but I never could understand why webpack decided to mangle the code so badly.


CSS - Yes. JS - Not since 2015, I'll admit that is somewhat recent. HTML IDs - IDs are only good if they're unique. Since HTML had no notion of scope, they became global. Shadow DOM is the web platform answer for modularization, however any JS framework will allow you to slice your CSS and HTML in components.


Maybe those users simply aren't interested enough in your product? I think adding a simple note "click on the labels to see a demo" should be enough discoverability.


Any UX designer will tell you that users don't read notes.


This depends a little on the taste of each person, but personally the most elegant way of doing PHP apps I ever found is with Siler: https://siler.leocavalcante.dev/v/main/ and Create Siler App: https://github.com/leocavalcante/create-siler-app


That's a kinda chicken and egg problem. I could argue that the more financing you give to people, the more they're gonna be willing to pay, so this actually drive prices up.


The best example I ever saw, and a great UI framework/component library on top of it, it's NaiveUI - www.naiveui.com . The code is all in JSX + Typescript, I didn't find a single component with html templates.


If you have a Windows 10 license, you already have a Windows 11 "license", since the update is free.


They tried that with Windows 8, the backslash was so enormous that I think they will be on the safe side and stick with 'familiarity' for the foreseeable future.


Win8 re-design was completely unrequested, most people hailed Win7 as the best Win UI iteration. Win 8 was a desperate, unguided attempt to make the Win UI fit on tablets, which failed, hence the full-screen "Start screen"


I found a link to a tool[0] that checks your PC compatibility with Windows 11, but it seems that many many people with powerful devices are getting a "No" answer.

[0] https://twitter.com/_h0x0d_/status/1408075658350108674


Looks like AMD systems might mostly be coming back as "This PC can't run Windows 11."

> Trusted Platform Module (TPM) version 2.0

Possibly most AMD motherboards don't have TPM integrated? I don't know a lot about TPM though.

Someone said...

> enable tpm in your bios i did it and it worked for me, I have a 3080, 5800x, 16gb of ram

EDIT: My motherboard (Asus Prime X470 Pro) lists TPM as a separate module you buy, but the connector is present. $12 module, for example: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1237446-REG/asus_tpm_...

The manual does list an fTPM setting as well, but I have not tested that yet.


> Possibly most AMD motherboards don't have TPM integrated? I don't know a lot about TPM though.

Ryzen CPUs do have TPM onboard - at least my Ryzen 3800X does have it. It's disabled by default for some reason.

Funny enough, Apple laptops don't have it so Windows 11 won't be usable in BootCamp on Intel Macs.


Thanks for this info.

Supposedly the fTPM should work with Ryzen CPUs and offer TPM 2.0, but I can't confirm now either.

Similar deal to yours, my Gigabyte x570 board offers TPM cards: https://www.gigabyte.com/us/Motherboard/TPM-Card. I am assuming this is unnecessary tho, but good to know.


Posting from the other Windows 11 post, I can confirm that a Ryzen fTPM will get a checkmark from the PC Health tool at least.

Screenshot of the security processor page: https://i.imgur.com/ZWtq8EO.png

Screenshot of the PC health check: https://i.imgur.com/Rb3eZIc.png


of the 20 or so machines I've owned in the last 15 years I think only one of them has had a TPM, and that was an enterprise laptop

no gaming motherboard I've ever had has had a TPM

edit: seems like the intel PTT bios option counts, so maybe not a huge problem (though it's off by default everywhere)


So now we finally know that 2025 will be the year of the Linux desktop. There will be no more supported Windows version for older hardware, and Microsoft's love for Linux will finally blossom into forcing migration for millions of computers. This is the most interesting part of the announcement, and I hope that desktop Linux distros will take advantage of the situation. Of course, Microsoft could reverse course by then.

edit: Looks like TPM 2.0 is not a hard requirement, only 1.2. This will likely still result in a lot of users left out of Windows, but the year of the Linux desktop may be delayed again. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/compatibility/windo...


I have a badass gaming rig and I got the not compatible message. lol. Oh well.


Yes, I opened it from windows explorer icon


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: