Does Vanadium include the necessary APIs for uBlock Origin? Otherwise this seems like having a long explanation of how secure the windows are with titanium frames and bulletproof glass while the front door is wide open.
Vanadium implements per-site content filtering as a usability feature via Chromium's in-built filtering engine [0]. They currently use EasyList & EasyPrivacy filters which are quite popular and also a prominent default in uBlock Origin [1].
uBlock origin won't save you from exploits in Firefox. The only way it would've might save you is if you disabled first-party JS, which you might as well just disable in the browser itself.
Chromium still is the superior browser in terms of security and Firefox is way behind. Adding an extension so you _might_ have less security exploits in the foundation is a wrong tactic and should be avoided.
Real world threats generally aren't exploiting process memory errors or whatever. Unless they're in the shadier parts of the web, users are unlikely to encounter such things even when they might exist. Spyware and adware threats on the other hand are ubiquitous and highly likely to be encountered by nearly everyone. A web browser that doesn't mitigate that is simply not fit for purpose. It's a table stakes security requirement.
Currently all the browsers are with ads by default. Not ideal but certainly most don't encounter spyware through ads, unless they're in some spam sites.
There exists a class of questions in life that appear remarkably simple in structure and yet contain infinite complexity in their resolution space. Consider the familiar or even archetypal inquiry: "Darling, please be honest: have I gained weight?"
Have you found the output for arbitrary grammars to be satisfactory? My naive assumption has been that these models will produce better JSON than other formats simply by virtue of having seen so much of it.
If you want to get a good result, the grammar should be following the expect output from the prompt, especially if you use a small model. Normally I would manually fine-tune the prompt to output the grammar format first, and then apply the grammar in production.
Grammars don't have to just be JSON, which means you could have it format responses as anything with a formal grammar. XML, HTTP responses, SQL, algebraic notation of math, etc.
That's moving the goal posts. The important thing is that macro invocations can be found "statically" (with out knowing the implementations of macros at all let alone evaluating).
One way to look at this is that partial evaluation of Rust or Scheme macros is very tractable, because there are very few side effects / side channels. But if you have a lack of hygiene or the C preprocessor, it's very difficult and almost everything becomes a "stuck term" whose evaluation is contingent on earlier evaluation.
That's true about the pure act of parsing and generating an AST. Bit once we want to do semantic analysis, this is no longer true.
Because of procedural macro, it becomes practically impossible to find all occurrences or rename a particular symbol regardless of the #ifdef or #[cfg] or whatever.
So with true hygienic macros, this is not the case. Even with procedural macros, quoted identifiers are resolved where they are quoted not where they are expanded. Identifiers that are not in scope at the macro definition site would have to be parameters, and those are caught at the invocation site just like any other identifier (the quote and splice cancel out).
I am not sure whether Rust procedural macros are always that hygienic, so fair point if they aren't.
> To keep this in context, the current Hong Kong SAR government is democratically elected[6] according to the provisions of an international treaty signed by the PRC and the UK which took effect in 1997[7].
Democratically elected ? Note that hong kong functional constituency system is fully controlled by CCP.
Functional constituencies are part of the Hong Kong legislature. Imagine that half of the US Congress is appointed by the President of the United States.
I don't know anything about their net code, but I suspect this is more about the fact that the game is less dependent on precise timing then something like a shooter or Smash.
Could be using Photon but I don't think Photon solves this particular problem as far as I know. Did you see something in particular that mentions that as a feature?
That was exactly how I learned what goatse was. My MySpace page was all decked out with images that I was hotlinking from some server... The server owner realized this and replaced all the images with Goatse. One day a friend goes "Hey... uh, what's up with your MySpace page... that's pretty gross". So I went to log in: Goastse. Goastse everywhere (gestures with hand). And my eyes were never the same again ಠ_ಠ
That was popular in the early ebay days when you had to host your own images. A friend had someone selling similar items using his image links. So he changed the images to goatse. Problem solved.
It wasn't only CNN. A bunch of big news sites linked directly to the image hosted at tribalwar. It all started with some news video of one of the WTC towers smoking. Someone on the forum screenshoted the video and asked "what is this?" because the smoke produced this weird devil-like formation. That picture goes spread around and soon news sites started writing stories saying that triablwar had photoshopped the image and that they were evil and making fun of a tragedy blah blah blah. So basically the news sites were DDOSing tribalwar and lying about them to make them look bad in their sensationalist articles. The administrators of the forums send many emails begging them to stop directly linking to the site and it only got worse and worse. Finally they replaced the image with goatse (with text overplayed giving the true story). If I remember correctly the image was viewed by hundreds of thousands or maybe more people before they were totally removed. That was how tribalwar goatsed the internet. It really was quite legendary.
Because it is one of the things that will get you added to the blocklists that form part of the Great Firewall of China.
It won't stop a hacker who is probably bypassing parts of that anyway, but the more casual requests such as those caused by deep linking will generally stop getting through.
