Splitting tasks like researching, coding and reviewing across multiple LLMs and/or sessions, can reduce or eliminate these issues while giving you more control over your context windows. This also provides the side benefit of a ‘second opinion’ and a more general perspective on a given topic.
Perhaps the notion of ‘engineering’ ones legitimacy as a ruler was seen as a challenge to the established notion of legitimacy by divine right. (Esp. the role of the church in conferring that right).
If you are willing to relinquish copyright claims on your work, for example by including a copyleft statement in the book’s preface, an organization like Project Gutenberg may be willing to host it, ostensibly in perpetuity. Other considerations are whether the book can stand alone as text-only, or will it rely on additional media to convey its message to the reader?
Just to clarify, I'm asking where to host a static page that would be a modified introduction, addendum, errata, "if you like this try these", "The author died by wooden badger attack", etc
Not the entire book. I wouldn't have to copyleft the entire thing, right?
My current static page is just an "I like this book, please give me this free thing and put me on a mailing list" kind of thing. But that's not really the point. The point is "how can I use static pages, presumably the thing the internet was built for, to put a few pages of extra material on the book and perhaps give links for folks to follow if they're interested in the topic?"
Traditionally, you'd issue a new edition with such information, but that seems like a hella work and expenditure, and small stuff like this should be the kind of thing you'd be able to stick somewhere online, if nothing else as a parking spot until you eventually publish a new edition.
I wonder if the Internet Archive would be interested in this kind of archival.
Traditionally, the answer would be "Use PURLs". The Internet Archive happens to operate the purl.org resolver.
Unfortunately, with the recent attack, the purl.org resolver went offline and remains so. All the purl data is still there and is accessible to the public, you just don't get resolvable URLs for them.
Nowadays, it seems like ARKs are the better way to go, anyway, and the attack on archive.org proved it perfectly. Look into <https://arks.org/>
(The Internet Archive mints ARKs for every item uploaded to its collections. You may have noticed them in the infobox below the fold when looking at a given item.)
As for your latter remarks, the Internet Archive will take just about anything. Create an account and start uploading. Ted Nelson has a huge chunk of his papers on there.
So, the story concept of Metropolis will be out of copyright. However the distribution of digitally remastered copies of it can remain legally subject to similar licensing and drm protections that copyrighted/licensed works enjoy — but only insofar as the original media from which they are derived are still privately-owned physical property, in limited supply — right?
reply