Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mike00632's commentslogin

Does anyone else, when writing comments, feel that you need to add a special touch to somehow make it clear that a human wrote it?


I have never tried GPT-4 because I don't pay for it. I'm really looking forward to GPT-4o being released to free tier users.


I was shocked at how quickly and naturally they were able to correct the situation.


For what it's worth, OpenAI also shared videos of failed demos:

https://vimeo.com/945591584

I really value how open they are being about its limitations.


I've had the same experience. Now ChatGPT is my go-to.

I often paste error messages with context into the chat and ask what's wrong.


This is a very interesting example. I don't blame LLMs for not understanding which English text makes hard sounds. I wonder if it would get better if it were multi-modal.


I just asked Chat GPT 3.5 the following: "Please give an exponential equation that has integer solutions which is difficult to solve.", and the response is: "

Certainly, here's an exponential equation that can be challenging to solve for integer solutions:

2^x+3^y=7^z

This equation involves three variables, x, y, and z, and requires finding integer values for these variables that satisfy the equation. This type of equation is known as a Diophantine equation, and solving it can be quite challenging, especially for larger values of x, y, and z.

"


That's quite the nerd snipe.

I mean, it's definitely not a Diophantine equation and solving it is definitely not challenging -- (2, 1, 1) happens to be an easy solution -- but I want to say it probably doesn't have any other solutions but I don't see a great way to prove it...


Can it reason about a math problem that no human ever thought about and solve it ?


Reasoning about a math problem that no human has ever thought about and solving it is the bar for understanding now ? Can you do that ?


Donate to the Internet Archive/Wayback Machine!

https://help.archive.org/help/category/donations-2/donating-...


or better yet, archive.today


Some members of the LK-99 team published a claim of superconductivity and it included falsified data. Nature published it and had to retract it.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05294-9

https://www.science.org/content/article/something-seriously-...


The paper with the falsified data is from an american team and has absolutely nothing to do with LK-99.


Doesn't the same apply to alcohol?


Alcohol use exerts enormous tax on society which chose to tolerate it for historical adoption reasons. Adding hard drugs is going to exacerbate the situation, and a number of those are worse than alcohol by any metric imaginable.


So then alcohol should be banned? Why the line if only historical?


Alcohol has been with us for millennia, with cultural references going back to Homer. It is deeply embedded in our social fabric. Perhaps at some point it would be banished like tobacco is now. But it makes little sense introducing the prohibition when the bulk of society isn't on board with it.


It’s hard to get toothpaste back into the tube.


Historical


Yes, it should.


Remember last time we tried that? It was not good...


Sure. I wouldn’t be against a ban on alcohol also, with the same prohibitions.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: