I’m working on DeepCost.ai, an AI-driven cloud cost optimization tool for AWS, GCP, and Azure.

The goal is to help small teams and fast-growing startups understand where cloud spend is leaking and automatically reduce waste (idle resources, over-provisioned workloads, inefficient Kubernetes setups, and AI API usage). Setup is lightweight, and we focus on actionable recommendations rather than massive dashboards.

We’re still early and testing with a few teams who want better cost visibility without running a full FinOps practice.

Website: https://deepcost.ai

I’m building an open-source tool called kafy, which is a kubectl-style cli for Kafka. It’s meant to handle all Kafka use cases and some basic AWK-like operations for inspecting topics, brokers, and consumer groups.

The tool is free and open-source, so anyone can use it for their own Kafka clusters. It’s very much a “crappy but functional” project at this stage — nothing fancy, just a practical CLI for certain tasks.

You can find it here: https://github.com/KLogicHQ/kafy

Is there any price comparison between Jules and Claude code?

Recently I moved from repl.it to Claude max to save costs.

Isn't replit more for vibe coding and Cluade Code for actual coding? They seem like very separate products.

Claude code does exactly what repl.it does. But in repl.it, you can see the dashboard/Ui instantly without running in the local machine.

You are 100% right. Maintaining angular.js for large scale app is pain.

Our use case is to execute test scripts in a sandbox mode. This is multi host and multi region setup. We might run millions of test scripts per day.

One of our engineers found https://testcontainers.com. We find it interesting and it seems like it won’t maintain container live. Instead, it start and remove the container for each test. We might need to implement lock mechanism to run only maximum number of containers at a time. I don’t know whether it fits for highly scalable test cases.

That’s a super exciting use case — running millions of test scripts across a multi-host, multi-region setup is no small feat. You're spot on about Testcontainers — it's elegant for one-off, isolated runs (like in CI), but when you're pushing at scale, the overhead of spinning up and tearing down containers for every single test can start to hurt. In high-throughput environments, most scalable setups I’ve seen shift towards a pre-warmed pool of sandbox containers — essentially keeping a fleet of "hot" containers alive and routing tasks into them via docker exec. You lose a bit of isolation granularity but gain massively in performance. You could even layer in a custom scheduler (Redis- or NATS-backed maybe?) that tracks container load and availability across hosts. Pair that with a smart TTL+health checker, and you can recycle containers efficiently without zombie buildup. Also — curious if you've explored running lighter-weight VMs (like Firecracker or Kata Containers) instead of full Docker containers? They can offer tighter isolation with decent spin-up times, and could be a better fit for multi-tenant test runs at this scale. Would love to nerd out more on this — are you planning to open source anything from your infra? Or even just blog about the journey? I feel like this would resonate with a lot of folks in the testing/devops space.

How hard is to create company like Wiz?

If you haven’t used it I would try and kick the tires through your company. It’s a pretty powerful tool to put multiple cloud providers under a single pane of glass and normalize security terminology across them. And that’s before you get into the automations, the remediation, the optional Code and Defend add-ons, and more

Very very hard

There are many companies trying to imitate them but fail either on design, performance, scalability or some combination of the three.

Also, Wiz is a marketing and sales MACHINE.

Very difficult. There's a reason why they're worth this much to Google.

Good work.

Recently I tried rork.app to generate mobile games for my kids. It is really amazing. They also give published URL which we can directly use in the mobile.

Is there any significant difference in code generation?

I am not sure what you mean by difference in code generation.

I mean Flutter, React native or Native code.

This generates Flutter whereas rork generates react native.

Thanks. How to get back previous configuration in uBlock advance user setting?

Try https://atatus.com