Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | krasin's commentslogin

I am usually running Claude Code in tmux on a Mac. Absolutely zero scroll issues (but I use tmux scroll for that, naturally). It's a delight.

I did try using tmux in VS Code's terminal, but still managed to hit this issue with very large scroll buffers. Bumping tmux's internal scrollback buffer capacity to a 50-100k would delay the issue, but it would still eventually occur. In the last few CC versions they did get rid of the old buffer after e.g. conversation compaction, so that's maybe why you don't experience the issue anymore. An Anthropic engineer had even done a PR on tmux's GitHub repo to implement the OSC10/11 shennanigans, so jt seems tmux is not immune to it at all.

Apple raised iPad Pro prices in 2017 by $50 to address NAND memory chips price hikes from the vendors: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/13/ipad-pro-price-increase.html

Apple also raised iPad Pro prices when OLED screens were introduced.

That's a new product, not a raise of he existing product as is discussed.

Quilter is a real deal. Hopefully, open source catches up at some point. But for now, it's Quilter or a lot of manual work & more design iterations.

Yeah, this company (GeneralistAI) is, in my opinion, the most advanced robotics+AI company in the world. Slightly behind them Google DeepMind Robotics and Physical Intelligence, and then the rest.


In the meantime, China is constructing nuclear cargo ships ([1], [2]) that will be able to transport 14,000 containers at full throttle (200MW) without a need to refuel for years.

Obviously, it's still not done, and yet to prove to be profitable, but their reactor design does suggest that they have a chance to make it work and replace a lot of CO2 emissions.

1. Original article, but paywall: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3331031/chin...

2. Derivative (+based commentary), but no paywall: https://www.chosun.com/english/world-en/2025/11/07/MND3QUGUT...


Nuclear ship propulsion is not a new technology so I have no doubt they will succeed. But where this will and all previous attempts have (see: N.S. Savannah) failed is that ports do not want to accept such ships, because of environmental and insurance issues.


China owns some ports abroad and probably they have enough leverage in some of those countries to let their ships dock there.


> Nuclear ship propulsion is not a new technology

Have they been used in for-profit scenarios? Military ships and ice breakers don't have to turn a profit.


As much as we want the next generation ships with less CO2 emissions, that nuclear cargo ship is not coming anytime soon. It will use a Thorium melting salt reactor, which although not new, is still in experiment. US first proposed melting salt reactor in the 1940s and had operated one briefly in the 1960s. China is building and testing an experimental Thorium reactor. It made the news earlier this month for been successfully converting Thorium to Uranium, perhaps means it is actually burning Thorium as compare to rely on Uranium in previous melting salt reactors. The news also states the plan has 3 stages: experimental reactor, research reactor, and demonstration reactor. The current one is at first stage. The third stage, demonstrator reactor, is scheduled to build in 2035. Therefor that nuclear cargo ship is at least another 10 years from now.


Aren't all military submarines and aircraft carriers using nuclear power already? No reason they couldn't make it work as long as regulations allow them in ports.


No reason the ships can't be built but turning a profit is another thing. US nuclear-powered aircraft carriers cost ~$10 billion, though of course they have many other requirements.

Flying to the Moon can be made to work - it's been done for 56 years. But turning a profit is trickier.


How ironic, a huge "EMBRACING NET-ZERO FUTURE" logo on the behemoth filled with cheap plastic crap that will chill out in landfills for generations to come.


How ridiculous they're solving one part of the problem when other parts aren't solved.


If there was a trade-off: Stop climate change but increase platics production, would you do it?


I refer to the RDNA4 instruction set manual ([1]), page 90, Table 41. WMMA Instructions.

They support FP8/BF8 with F32 accumulate and also IU4 with I32 accumulate. The max matrix size is 16x16. For comparison, NVIDIA Blackwell GB200 supports matrices up to 256x32 for FP8 and 256x96 for NVFP4.

This matters for overall throughput, as feeding a bigger matrix unit is actually cheaper in terms of memory bandwidth, as the number of FLOPs grows O(n^2) when increasing the size of a systolic array, while the number of inputs/outputs as O(n).

1. https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/radeon-tech...

2. https://semianalysis.com/2025/06/23/nvidia-tensor-core-evolu...


It's misleading to compare a desktop GPU against a data center GPU on these metrics. Blackwell data center tenor cores are different from Blackwell consumer tensor cores, and same for the AMD side.

Also, the size of the native / atomic matrix fragment size isn't relevant for memory bandwidth because you can always build larger matrices out of multiple fragments in the register file. A single matrix fragment is read from memory once and used in multiple matmul instructions, which has the same effect on memory bandwidth as using a single larger matmul instruction.


> This sounds like a happy ending for the employees of Windsurf and a good deal for Cognition

The employees were robbed from having a big cash exit. Illiquid stock options from Windsurf were converted to illiquid stock options of Devin.

What's worse is that the well is now poisoned. I would advise against joining startups from now on, because I think that there's no upside for employees anymore.


Not only they do not release models/weights. They don't even tell the size of the models!

The linked whitepaper is pretty useless, and I am saying as a big fan of diffusion-transformers-for-not-just-images-or-videos approach.

Also, Gemini Diffusion ([1]) is way better at coding than Mercury offering.

1. https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-diffusion/


The story is amazing and officially available online: https://marshallbrain.com/manna1


I enjoyed that first bit, I'll give it a read. Thank you both


This is just a fake product page to gauge interest.

From their "order" page:

> UPERFECT Omega is currently in the concept stage and will soon be put into research and development.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: