They are using https://screen.studio/

It is pretty cool!

Not affiliated :)

Thanks!

Yep. And what makes it good is that it automatically zooms in and out when you take actions or move the cursor - it edits for you

My solution would be to simply ignore all cookies from any new website and only allow once a button has been pressed by the user in the address bar.

There is no reason why a website should be able to track from the first second that easily

> There is no reason why a website should be able to track from the first second that easily

There's one big reason for that: The world's most popular browser and search engine both make their money by tracking you from the first second to the last

I have been thinking it was the best way to introduce people to Blockchain but having to deploy it on a layer 2 and having to teach people how to switch has discouraged me a bit for getting started.

I was thinking it could be for the social club or a charity project.

Yeah, but during the trial it was not even hinted at that the platform was the problem for the lost money.

I think it is also possible to build, but for a trading platform you have no room for mistake. Production being down and you could be liable for positions not be sold. Maybe that is were a lot of the money went.

But what would you calculate the risk for one of the 25 developers being extorted? The benefits would easily be millions of dollars.

I think you are right, but security teams is for when things does not go as expected.

Like Opensea had insider trading but they were not nearly as big as FTX, everyone knew FTX. Opensea is “just” a marketplace, not even near a live trading platform.

But there will probably be more information about it the next 10 years heh.

> security teams is for when things does not go as expected.

That's an unexpected view. Security teams are experts in security and help application developers think of ways the product could be exploited. Security teams run pen tests and bug bounty programs. Security teams manage compliance.

Separation of duties is a critical part of building a secure system, and you can't have separation of duties properly if app developers do it all.

Don't think of a security team a punishment for when things didn't go as expected, but a good security team can help increase velocity and confidence and security all at the same time.

Yes, that is also what I meant :)

But with 10-25 developers I do not think they had what we both think are essential.

Yes, correctly, but that does not prevent extorting one of the developers and have that person help commit trading fraud or theft.

Of course it is possible to do extortion in every sector, but no sector has companies that valuable in such short time.

Google Support is not easy.

But I wonder if it is because Anthos is not right for your company, it is primarily from my understanding companies with big VMWare setups and the price for Anthos is heavy.

Why will you want to use Anthos? I was at the Google Cloud Next where it was announced and was also excited, but asked a lot about from my closer Google relations and it was not something for the public was my learnings. Very complicated, heavy and expensive.

we want anthos multi-cloud K8S so that we can launch private cloud clusters within customers VPCs. we thought anthos was a good way to do this, maybe.

looking at the market for multi-cloud k8s, anthos seems like a leader. we were using it with GKE Autopilot and similar tech with less overhead than, say, a VMware fleet.

just using Anthos Config Sync and perhaps Service Mesh isn't that heavy, and didn't require much change from our existing k8s configs.

that being said, the platform seems to fall short in other ways (cost, support, docs).

Are you exposing full node or archive node? Because Archive node is several terabytes :)

It doesn't have the states yet. So, equivalent of full nodes -- block, txns, receipts, logs (no traces, states).

But, could be extended to include those, if needed.

I think there is a lot of people that want the integration just for the free promotion from Zapier and a seal of approval if your app supports Zapier. I think they have define these rules to weed out all the non-serious partners.

Like a lot of the integrations would work fine with the default Webhook integration they have and then your app's webhook.