Why do you make a live HTML5 editor using Node.js but you don't make it work online? I think it would be much awesome and useful if it worked online and you could embed it on any website.
I was thinking on real time examples where you could play around with the code to learn how stuff works. It would be great for learning how to code or for explaining how a library works.
The reason why I made it with node-webkit and not online is because I prefer my editors to be desktop. However, implementing a preview on the download page would be a good idea too.
That's what I was going for when I made my GitHub Gist viewer (http://thedata.directory/view/10570653)
If you have an HTML gist it'll display it when you put the gist number in the path (as in the link above). It will also give you an embed code so you can collaborate.
While I can't speak for the author, one benefit of packaging your app with node-webkit[1]; is that your app is always used inside this container, that bundles a very recent version of Chromium and has a node.js backend with file system access.
I think it's great for YC to improve and help women but I hope YC doesn't start accepting female funded companies just for the sake of having more female founders instead on looking at the quality of the startups.
Read the article carefully; we won't. We'll accept female-founded companies because some of them will be extremely successful. Everyone is subject to the same bar (this is addressed in the middle of the post).
How can YC be pressured? They sure don't have an LP problem. In terms of hiring for YC itself, it's already quite diverse.
The only thing YC really needs to care about is 1) getting the best possible startups to apply and then 2) for those companies to be successful.
#2 is pretty much immune to pressure-on-YC; YC has no control of YC startups, with only 2-10% common equity. #1 is explicitly the thing they are working on, so it seems unlikely "we will pressure you to accept more female founders if you don't accept more female founders by convincing female founders not to apply" would be a realistic threat.
Practically everyone would agree that the status quo is not just YC's fault. For example, the STEM gender gap plays a big role, and that's not something YC is directly responsible for. So it's easy to conclude that YC shouldn't just go right for a 50:50 ratio because the burden shouldn't rest entirely on their shoulders.
But here's another way to look at it: Accepting more women applicants -- even if they don't fit YC's acceptance heuristic (which is, by definition, already an approximation for actual success) as well -- is not necessarily a bad idea. Sexism and other irrational biases are strongly fueled by bad intuitions, and people learn these bad intuitions by not seeing enough diversity in tech and/or founders. This is a situation that YC can improve.
This wouldn't be about lowering the bar. It's more like accounting for the "home field advantage" that males have long benefited from, and eventually eliminating the advantage by letting everyone play on a neutral field starting with their first game. (First person to come up with a better metaphor gets an upvote...)
(edit: and yes, I know @sama says YCombinator won't do that. But it's still worth considering!)
He mentions -multiple times- in the article that they wish to avoid this. I don't know what could have prompted you to write this comment if you read it, he says it more than once...
