Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jhbadger's commentslogin

That's a different issue. Things like Electron are popular not because native development is buggy, but because most developers these days are web developers. They know Javascript. They've never written anything in C/C++ or even the slightly friendlier Swift, Rust, or Go. Electron lets people who only know the Web make desktop apps.

Nope, it is the same issue now being worded around to sell the Apple is shiny story above.

> Apple is shiny story

Is a fantasy you invented to argue against.

Microsoft’s 1st party offerings are an embarrassment.

Apples first party offering isnt amazing either; it’s just “ok”; but its not a total embarrassment.


You can argue that a true meritocracy still wouldn't be ideal (as Young did), but that argument seems irrelevant -- the problem in the real world is that we pretend that we have a meritocracy, but often the person who gets the promotion or whatever isn't actually the best at their job, but is a cousin or fraternity brother of the person in charge -- the old "it isn't what you know, but who you know".

  > often the person who gets the promotion or whatever isn't actually the best at their job
it would be interesting to experiment with how people get promoted in orgs... maybe vote by co-workers? or by team members?

Or the "Whiz Kids" that Robert McNamara brought into the DoD in the 1960s who were supposed to win the war in Vietnam through game theory and other applications of science and technology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiz_Kids_(Department_of_Defen...


He did have his showman side certainly -- but I'd argue that Alan Sugar of Amstrad was more the UK Steve Jobs because Clive Sinclair really did have deep technological knowledge himself (even though he obviously also had a staff of talented engineers like Richard Altwasser who rarely got their due in the public eye)

There isn't a technical reason why titles have to be that short, memory isn't in that short supply despite the RAM shortages. A function, therefore an algorithm, is deciding to truncate the title for some reason.

Which you find to be the reasonable explanation over just OP editorializing the title with their own hands because...?

Because the edited title is incoherent and grammatically incorrect.

Until recently that would have marked it as likely done by simplistic automation. These days, it's hard to tell, because humans seem more likely to make simple errors of grammar.


It makes sense that they'd make a tomato-like fruit because potato plants, like tomato plants, are part of the Solanaceae (nightshade family). Also, not that surprising for the same reason that they are poisonous

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solanaceae


I remember Anacreon! I used to play that, and another Turbo Pascal game called BEGIN that was a sort of port of the Star Fleet Battles board game on my first PC clone that I got in the early 1990s aftet leaving the 8-bit world.

I really liked the widget set (custom made for the program) that xv used. In the 1990s it looked far more "professional" than most GUI apps on Linux/Unix in general.

Even though I hadn't thought about xv in decades, as soon as I read the headline, the image of those 3d buttons with the crisp outlines resurfaced from my memory.

I remember when IBM was upset that various companies were calling their 80286 computers "<Brandname> AT" like the IBM AT ("advanced technology"). But you can't trademark a preposition!

It's not that simple -- you can definitely trademark a preposition. Go search USPTO, it's not hard to find some: https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/search/search-results/90234636

I'm just waiting for daguerreotypes to come back into fashion.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: