Yeah I suspect that people are being over-diagnosed, but I also suspect we're catching dramatically more cases than we were previously. An overcorrection if you will.

The "left handedness" graph change that occurred once we stopped punishing people for being left handed. Same sort of thing here. We'll stabilize once we get good at diagnosing it and stop stigmatizing it. We're in a period where the graph is changing, and that change is disruptive, but it'll level out.

Sure. We're also changing rubrics and even inventing new conditions, and we don't really try to graduate them. On top of that, there are perverse incentives. Amphetamine is an amazing drug, and since some people get it, those who don't find it hard to compete. So, we have to give them a way to get it, because the side effect of not doing that is popping them with felony drug trafficking charges at the airport. I don't blame anyone for playing the game.

Suspecting is reasonable. So is suspecting it is under-diagnosed.

Ranting about how all these diagnoses are fake is not.

Time may revise our opinions of the current state, but with the exception of malpracticing professionals, the diagnoses are valid for given state of medical health knowledge.

I don't believe the diagnoses are fake. I didn't rant. I said I suspect. In fact I am diagnosed myself and have benefited from the diagnosis.

Essentially yes, not necessarily equivalently but every type has increased substantially

previous: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12281637

While I agree with your conclusion

> While this analysis might be completely off, the simple fact that I could get even this information without much efforts is mind-boggling. With better setup it might be able to get more.

This can essentially be rephrased as "I don't know if what the LLM said is true or not but the fact it may or may not be correct is amazing!"

I don't know what the LLM said is true for sure but based on my experience in the field sounds plausible. The only way to know is to verify it.

Btw, LLMs are already used in vulnerability discovery and exploit development.

> The only way to know is to verify it.

Which you should've done before making such statements imo.

There is some value:

> The vulnerability exists in the default configuration of affected applications

Can be inferred from the react blog but isn't really explicit

> According to Wiz data, 39% of cloud environments have instances vulnerable to CVE-2025-55182 and/or CVE-2025-66478.

Numbers!

>> According to Wiz data, 39% of cloud environments have instances vulnerable to CVE-2025-55182 and/or CVE-2025-66478.

> Numbers!

I do not see how such numbers are valuable to people reading this post, as the first indication of the existence of this vulnerability.

They also paid me something around 100 dollars in settlement for this

> What do I feel like custom font generation is one thing AI could be really good at

Probably because you're wrong. Anybody can make a font, making a good font is a highly under appreciated art form.

I find that a “good” font is just whatever aesthetic people find popular, regardless of legibility.

Ask the models to create vector SVGs and you'll understand how far off they are on shapes.

The latest Nano Banana is pretty good, but it's not perfect yet. And many font use cases demand perfect.

Maybe the next major update will be able to do it.

What a bereft way to produce beauty. "This grey slop is good enough, isn't it?" Christ, people, let's be human again.

My man, that battle is lost.

Only if you give up.

I had to factory reset my Mac because inexplicably Siri, Spell Check, and Apple Intelligence were "disabled by my admin." I have no MDM. I am my admin. I spent roughly a month delving through logs trying to resolve it.

Why did you decide against SwiftUI?

I ultimately prefer React Native's composition model over SwiftUI.

Something that attracts me to RN is that it's easy to drop down to native. We use SwiftUI for a number of components under the hood. But for a full app, React Native felt better.

> My guess is that adblock became too easy on smartphones

Not within native apps. Your only option is essentially dns/hosts based on both platforms however this can also be done on the router. On Android there is ReVanced I guess. But these are almost as technical as a pihole. What is the percent of people who know of DNS based adblock but not pihole?

Edit: And DNS adblocking can be done on android tv.

Sure, but I've never had a 'standard router' with support dns blocking. I know you can do this with something like pfsense, but that's not that common.

You also have the option to put a piehole in your network. It is pretty easy if you have some technical knowledge but I would say that it is generally out of reach for the general population(non-tech folks).

But on android you just open the settings, search for 'private vpn' and paste an url. This is way easier to do for someone with no technical background. Even chatgpt should be able to correctly guide you through these steps.