Sure, it's hard to make money in open source. I spent 20 years doing it. It ain't easy.
But here's the thing: open source also helps you accelerate a business you might not otherwise be able to build. You get market validation by giving away a free thing, and then you hope to be able to collect some revenue on the backend once you've got a large enough user base, a proven product, and maybe even some contributors. Maybe even a whole ecosystem. You think VCs would have thrown all that money at a thing with no users?
Want to throw it all out? Fine. That's your right. But it's not gonna stop companies from forking the last open source licensed codebase and taking your cookies.
Open core is a thing. You can be good at it, and users understand and respect it. You would think that Mitchell would have learned after his failure to monetize Packer that he needed an actual proprietary value prop to build around before he built Hashi. Guess not.
Lemoine is just saying in a breathless and credulous way many of the same things that Google VP and Research Fellow Blaise Agüera y Arcas said in an Economist article 4 days ago:
Instead of reading Lemoine's blog post in isolation, go read this piece in the Economist. It's far more realistic, and more insightful, and comes to a similar conclusion: LaMDA feels like it's approaching real intelligence.
> LaMDA feels like it's approaching real intelligence
No one is disputing this. What is very, very important, however, is remembering the difference between 'feels like' and 'is'.
LLM aren't sentinent; we know what they're doing and they're not doing that. The same people who know exactly how to treat wild claims in their own fields (perpetual motion machines, homeopathy, etc.) are falling headfirst into this one because it seems to be part of their fields and yet they don't understand it.
Sure, it's hard to make money in open source. I spent 20 years doing it. It ain't easy.
But here's the thing: open source also helps you accelerate a business you might not otherwise be able to build. You get market validation by giving away a free thing, and then you hope to be able to collect some revenue on the backend once you've got a large enough user base, a proven product, and maybe even some contributors. Maybe even a whole ecosystem. You think VCs would have thrown all that money at a thing with no users?
Want to throw it all out? Fine. That's your right. But it's not gonna stop companies from forking the last open source licensed codebase and taking your cookies.
Open core is a thing. You can be good at it, and users understand and respect it. You would think that Mitchell would have learned after his failure to monetize Packer that he needed an actual proprietary value prop to build around before he built Hashi. Guess not.
You can't have it both ways.