I only made two plugins. I have two half baked ones in the making. Both Shreyas and me have day jobs and this is a side quest. Overall, my contributions are about 1% of all the code, so I accept the 1% of the thanks. Kudos to Shreyas.

I am fan of Technitium, because I like to build and I built two plugins for it to fit my use case. But at work, we use Windows DNS and Bind in parallel. So, this is also a hobby of mine. The hook for me is that it is built with dotnet, and I have experience in that stack. Other features are secondary actually.

I am curious though, what would TDNS do so that you can replace BIND with TDNS in your homelab/workplace or wherever it is used? I genuinely ask for it so that I can help the original developer with some PRs.

The only problem there is for GDPR consent thingy. You can disable and proceed. I don't use any telemetry except for the consent banners.

When it comes to Technitium, well, it's written in the blog.

If my browser is blocking cookies, you don't need my consent, because you're not going to set any cookies.

GDPR preempted...

Yes. That's why I put the footnote there.

Well, I read that footnote, but I'm not sure if overloading the acronym is the best idea, is what I'm trying to say.

I agree with you there. But the term does not belong to me buy yo CISA and other organisations. But it's not as bad as Cyber Security Awareness Month acronym at least

I've played with threat intelligence to build a simple, on premises PDNS out of a privacy-focused DNS server.

I like to build.

Those two "PowerShell"s are not the same. For the sake of cross platform deployment, they moved away from the original a lot -though they managed to support many things in time. The old and original one was released in 2006,IIRC, so it didn't exist in 90s.

An SBOM-like approach to EOL/EOS issues is on the way.

I think the only large projects that presently take SBOMs seriously are Nix, Guix, and Go (non-cgo). Bootstrapping is non-trivial, but at least builds are reproducible and can be compared against existing binaries.

"Oh, just write plain C". Which compiler do you mean? GCC? LLVM/clang? On top of what OS/kernel? What firmware? Etc.

Some distros packaging Rust software (OpenSUSE at least) also transparently set up CARGO=cargo-audit to get embedded SBOMs.

What's worse for me is that the Check Point Harmony does notnutilize the interfaces of Defender crafted for this purpose, but write a knowledge base article to tell the users to disable the Defender themselves.

I haven't use them, so please bear my illiteracy around these. Does this mean, it actually creates a local session, not a remote and headless session to serve? If that's the case, it feels like it's just TeamViewer or Remote Assist session where you hop in to an existing session. Or do I misunderstand the concept?

So Sunshine and Apollo are continuations of Nvidia's EOL'd GameStream tech, which is designed to mirror the local display to a device. It doesn't really have the concept of a "user session", it allows you to mirror the currently running local session remotely.

> If that's the case, it feels like it's just TeamViewer or Remote Assist session where you hop in to an existing session

Yes, it's pretty much that, but optimized for A/V latency and game inputs (games that "trap" the mouse in fullscreen are well supported and controller inputs are passed through).

I haven't really used TeamViewer/Remote Assist heavily, but I wager if you wanted to game with those tools it would be a worse experience than something like Sunshine.