We need extra laws to punish companies that try to fend of human users with AI "support" bullshit.
Allow users to file a lawsuit against the company using AI against their customers and judge the company only on what the AI generated without a chance to add anything more in their defense. Also any boilerplate legalese the AIs will quote in reaction to such laws is null and void.
Suddenly every AI support channel will have an "escalate to human support" button.
I've been running full dual stack for >15 years now. It has become second nature by now and I'm slowly testing IPv6 mostly, but so far it's just easier to deliver dual-stack to all users instead of dealing with workarounds to make the last few non-IPv6 capable services work without native IPv4.
What shitty ISP operates like that? I frequently see IPv6 have *lower* latency because of fewer middle boxes and fewer hops in general. Your routers in the default free zone shouldn't be close to their TCAM limits with a single IPv4 routing table.
Since when does putting criminals on official wanted lists count as doxxing?!? If they want their information taken down they just have to show up in court.
You have to understand children are only cute little extensions of their parents until they 18, but on that day they better be ready for the real world™. /s
This is on the stupid side of lazy (again). You'll still be sovereign only at the pleasure of Apple and Google if you submit to their platform as a service crap.
reply