Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | boxed's commentslogin

Parental controls are just absolutely broken. I hope Ternus has some kids and is upset about this too.

Screen time is totally broken. Produces numbers hilariously wrong. Again a problem for people with kids.

Spotlight searching on macOS just breaks and forcing a rescan can fix it for a while, but it can break pretty faster after randomly.


So it's not actually about AI at all? It's about it being incorrect?

It’s about humans presenting something plausibly awful in a deceptive way, and using a machine to be plausible and deceptive.

The telly tale flip flopping of someone driven by emotion not logic

It's not flip-flopping, they're answering the question that you posed. You claimed that the constraint is arbitrary, they demonstrated how it isn't.

I even made a better map in a few minutes to prove the point: https://bsky.app/profile/kyefox.com/post/3mkibnvrt3c25

There are still inaccuracies, but I'm also not pretending to care about legacy like Moleskine.


It's incorrect because it was lazily AI-generated. Most modern AI image generators can handle this if you're the least bit thoughtful.

Or just statically build the HTML. That's what we do for iommi docs: https://kodare.net/2025/01/14/iframes-not-screenshots.html

For web projects, consider not doing screenshots at all and just embedding the html: https://kodare.net/2025/01/14/iframes-not-screenshots.html

You can get responsive design in "screenshots" with this. Super nice, and people can copy paste, look at the code (useful for dev tools), etc.


I always find is weird how most super rich don't even seem to care about the life of their own children. If they did, surely they would invest more in basic science, or at least medical science.

If you can only afford to have one or two children and accordingly have one or two children, you'll care about how well your children fare in life.

If you can have ten, your worry becomes more about how/if your children preserve your legacy.


Most super rich don't have THAT many kids though.

You just define "advanced" as not "affordable" and your statement can be true forever!

Except of course, that's nonsense. mRNA vaccines are super advanced and available for a majority of humans. And tech drops in price if it's popular enough.


What about insulin?

So a few things:

- Insulin isn't crazy expensive outside the broken US system

- Let's assume it was, or some other medical advance was, so what? A few examples of something only very slowly going down in price doesn't change the fact that a lot of things DO go down in price or just exists at all due to basic science being done.


"Semantics" is literally "what words mean" so yea, arguing over semantics is pretty important! Not something to dismiss.

> I even tried Django, thinking I'd stick with Python, but it's accumulated so much over the years. Too much magic, too much stuff.

Heh. The problem with Django is certainly not that it has accumulated too much.

Anyway, this seems a bit silly. There's nothing here that is "agentic", and javascript is certainly not a language that is especially suited for LLMs except that the training data is there, but that's even more true of React or Django.


Yes, the main thing is that we're trying to see if AI can have an easier time using one framework vs. another, and how important it is.

All Rails-like frameworks (Django, Laravel, or Wasp in this case) claim its helpful to use something opinionated and structured, which makes sense (the tradeoff is the flexibility, of course).

We've run some early tests[1] but plan to do a more substantial benchmark next.

[1] https://wasp.sh/blog/2026/03/26/nextjs-vs-wasp-40-percent-le...


Django isn't really that opinionated though. It's a common misconception. It's quite decoupled with only the settings file being actually required.


In the Spanish colonies they speak Spanish.

In the Portuguese colonies they speak Portuguese.

In the __BLANK__ colonies they speak Hewbrew.

Fill in the blank.


Hew brew, as you spell it, is a resurrected language. It was extinct. It was resurrected solely as a tool for jewish nationalism.

And from which mother nation state was Israel a colony of?

It is a colony of the west. The UK started it, a lot of Russians took over, and it is an island of Europeans in the middle east, displacing peoples that have been living there for thousands of years.

Which is made even more clear by the colonialist behaviour of the settlers.


> displacing peoples that have been living there for thousands of years

Islam hasn't even existed that long. And the Arab conquest of the area is after islam was founded. Jews on the other hand have been living there for thousands of years.

> Which is made even more clear by the colonialist behaviour of the settlers

As opposed to...? The colonialist behavior of the muslims in the area are much worse, they just don't have the military competence to pull off their goals. So yea, I don't think settler violence is reasonable obviously, and Israel does in fact prosecute them sometimes. Hamas though? They celebrate murder always.


Ashkenazi, and only because they made a dedicated effort to switch from their native Yiddish to build the colonization narrative.

That's not a nation.

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: