A bit of a tangent, but the more complete reason depends on what civilization (Aztecs/Incas), the common factor is an extreme loss of life due to old world disease.
Additionally, for the projectile velocity at the time the gambeson-like garment the Aztecs had available was surprisingly effective.
Honestly, as much as I prefer Linux for most things Linux staying pat and macOS stealing market share from Windows is almost as good as Linux taking those users. I think we’re currently seeing a trend starting of people leaving Windows for each of them, and some users for both of them.
Technologies: Mainly Elixir, Ruby, most of modern front-end stack, some android work (native and react native), boilerplate provisioning and orchestration etc
Résumé/CV:
Web developer for 15+ years. Most of them working as a consultant for NA/EU clients, ranging from launching new products from scratch working closely with the partners to small/medium sized companies and teams. Failed 3 startups as a CTO before focusing on consultancy.
A few more details: https://gist.github.com/badosu/a252f4376461280837b3fda6c6f8c405
You can use some form of real extensions, e.g. the extended real line (+inf, -inf is often useful for programmers) or the projectively extended real line (+inf = -inf).
This is not about infinity in math not being a _specific_ value, it can certainly be (the actual infinite instead of potential).
It's simply about design and foresight, in my humble opinion.
I was fascinated when I first learned of [FreeBSD Jails], I wonder if right before containerization became a thing the concept was developed further for its requirements (could it have been?) it would have offered a more efficient containerization platform.
Jails are entirely different conceptually from UML; they share the host kernel and are roughly analogous to containers/namespaces. UML is an entirely separate kernel, running as user mode process.
I had a hard time trying to parse something understandable from the article.
This is what I got from it (I'd be happy to hear someone informed correcting me/confirming). (excerpt from a discussion yesterday I had with some friends not too math inclined)
What it seems to be the articles claim is that, you could define a scaling operation in the angles you performed, finding some constant scaling factor (say alpha) and running the operation twice to reach the identity (rotation 0 compared to baseline), e.g.:
I = R ⊕ (α.R ⊕ α.R)
In their example that would be something like (with alpha=0.3):
Additionally, for the projectile velocity at the time the gambeson-like garment the Aztecs had available was surprisingly effective.
reply