Attack surface is narrower on Firefox. WebExtensions without DOM-visible traces cannot be detected.

This is not Clacker News.

The CPU literally initialises itself without DDR then initialises the DDR PHY, there must be a way of keeping the CPU in that "cache as RAM" mode.

They would be medically unfit (NATO health class D) even if the age was unlimited.

Hegseth could dry out for a few weeks and then might pass the physical.

OF deliberately lacks a functioning promotion algorithm. And no, those manual promotions are rarer than you'd think.

And then there is 2500$ a hour solo creator not replaced by AI (different mode of operation though).

That service is already offered by Fanvue.

They do, but not an AI chatter.They train a content moderation model.

COBOL migration is one of Devin's advertised capabilities:

https://docs.devin.ai/use-cases/examples/cobol-modernization https://cognition.ai/blog/infosys-cognition

Wait - whoever is downvoting this, could you please also explain why?

I’m looking at a signal with no way to validate it (that this person may be biased?, exaggerating?, or lying?).

Stop downvoting without replying - it’s really unhelpful.

While I didn’t downvote it (and very rarely downvote things at all here), “some random tool advertises something vaguely related”, with no context, is not IMO a particularly interesting contribution.

Because they themselves use them?

Also because they know what happened to Microsoft when they did that with IE.

Microsoft didn’t control the number one search engine, the number one email client, the number one video site, probably the number one online office suite, the number one smartphone platform…

It was possible to rip people away from Microsoft. That may not be something we can do this time with Chrome.

Try telling someone that moving off of Chrome may mean moving off of every single Google property because Chrome is the only browser they work on by then.

See how easy an argument that is. It’s right up with there with “stop helping capitalism and move to the woods“.

Then it’d be time for round two of antitrust, and I doubt the judge and regulators would feel so understanding about Google keeping Chrome if that is the landscape.

I think that would’ve good. But…

1. The US isn’t doing this. They have a case but aren’t calling for breakup

2. We all know howling anti-trust and appeals take

If Google gets handed the web (let’s say) this year by Apple being forced to allow them, it could be a decade+ before the Google side gets tackled.

And I’m afraid of how much damage they can do in that timeframe.

I think fixing Google’s ownership over Chrome before forcing other browsers on iOS would be less harmless than forcing iOS to allow other browsers than doing Google.

I’m totally good with doing both. I worried about the effects of the order they’re done in.

And I am only saying this about browser engines. This should not be taken to say Apple should be able to do some of the other nonsense they’ve been doing for 10+ years abusing their position.

I think they might be, but only as long as it stays open-source (assuming we mean it works on Chromium and not Chrome). Honestly, I fundamentally don't have a problem with an open-source browser having a monopoly, because the open-source nature means that if things get bad you can always just fork it and make something better.