Just because they are not literally identical does mean they are unrelated. The author points this out and it sounds horrific.
> The four men interviewed by Amnesty International, as well as Florida-based organizations, told the organization about the ‘box’, described as a 2x2 foot cage-like structure located outside in the yard of “Alligator Alcatraz” where individuals are sent for punishment. Individuals are put in the ‘box’, their hands are shackled and their feet are attached to restraints on the ground. They are unable to sit down or move positions, and are forced to remain there for hours in the heat with hardly any water or protection from the sun, heat and insects. According to a man seeking safety, “People ended up in the ‘box’ just for asking the guards for anything. I saw a guy who was put in it for an entire day.”
> A "2x2 cage-like structure… [an] extremely small space that prevents sitting, lying or changing position" has dimensions startlingly reminiscent of those the Senate documented in the black sites. The major difference is that in Florida, the Small Box is exposed to the elements and constructed as a barred cage, whereas in Catseye, it was a closed structure inside the larger closed structure of the black site. And in Florida, the box is used as punishment. According to one of the Alligator Alcatraz survivors in the Amnesty report, people were put into the box simply for alerting the guards to someone's need for medication. "They were taken to 'the box' and punished for trying to help me," the person told Amnesty
I think if you ever get to the point where you're argument hinges on 'well actually it's torture but it's not THAT BAD of torture' you should really step back and analyze if your post is really worth making or not.
No, the opposite. To be protected by copyright, sources must be uploaded to a Library of Software.
Downside: Movies will be made to not last; Software will be made to be incompatible with everything on a 10-year timeframe; and the country who enabled this open mindset will displease its copyright owners who will move to the other countries.
One downside is it would motivate companies to get intellectual property registered under a trademark with indefinite protection rather than copyright. Even with our current lifetime + 70 year protection we have companies like Disney getting characters registered as a trademark.
Agreed, the problem is that in many scenarios where the US becomes a failed state.. you probably want to be IN the US rather than living under our security umbrella (Canada/Europe/Japan/Korea/Taiwan/Australia). Or worse, in a nation we might end up in a shooting war with (Russia/China).
Either enemies are going to make moves in our absence, or we are going to pray upon former allies (next orange man takes his trade wars kinetic).
So I'd rather still be in the exponentially larger (population & land) isolated continental power surrounded mostly by water and smaller states.
VB was the GUI equivalent of Dataflex - you could design the screen and it would automagically create the data structures under it. I also remember, from the same period, Mantis (from Cincom Systems) that did the same for 3270 terminals and IBM mainframes.
I often say Deteflex is Ruby on Rails for the VT100.
I would agree the anti-monopoly action had far more to do with that.
Basically, if you you think you can leverage your R&D into maintaining your monopoly and extending it to other areas it makes sense if for nothing else to keep the smart people who might otherwise disrupt your monopoly connected to you.
But if you are going to get broken up, just take as much short term profits as soon as you can
Yep. But my first thought on usage was "man this will make detecting home occupancy simpler" (till it turns out you can't distinguish from pets I suppose).
The articles wants to make you think the box is a 3d confinement reminiscent of the drawing.
From the description it sounds like it is a 4 square foot cage that the person stands in while cuffed.
Yes it’s bad.
No, it’s not like the box mentioned at the CIA Black site.
reply