Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Forbo's commentslogin

Reading their about page...

> globohomo

Yeah, no, fuck that bigoted bullshit and the people who made it.


They also sell a license with the new hardware. The bulk majority of the public never buy hardware without an OS. So yes, they are making more money with each new hardware sale. Plus the increase of forced advertising means they make more per user, effectively double dipping.

Why do you feel the need to defend a convicted monopolist for engaging in user hostile behavior?


As an American, we deserve the derision. Please, continue shaming us, maybe some day people will get sick enough of it to try to prove them wrong.

That's probably asking too much, though.


As an American who usually gets mistaken for a Canadian while traveling, I know that some of us know they aren’t talking about us, but also that the people who they are talking about aren’t even in the conversation.

It’s effectively talking about people behind their back which is not that useful.


When I say "the uneducated states" I'm referring to general trends:

- lack of technological fluency

- lack of mathematical/scientific fluency

- lack of financial fluency

- lack of political fluency

- lack of critical thinking skills

- willful engagement with streaming psy-op platforms: Facebook, Instagram, Netflix, Tiktok


Netflix a wild one to include in that list, imo. What makes you think it's on the same level? If you're making some reference to "cultural importance" I would wager that ABC/CBS in the 90s had just as strong a pull as Netflix does today culturally.


Agreed. And one of those six maybe applies to me. So I don’t sweat it, unless someone is being very broad and loud with the finger pointing.


The right wing nut jobs are most definitely in the conversation here.


ACCount37 expressly left out the coal smoke stacks from their description, so I'm not sure why you chose to focus solely on that and throw it back in?


What are cooling towers for if not for coal smoke stacks?


Nuclear


[flagged]


> I don't mind things like huge cooling towers or massive dams.

^That’s not “cherry picking.“ They are saying the two things that they would not mind seeing in the distance. It is reasonable to assume that it was not an omission to avoid hurting their point, but rather that coal power smoke stacks are not on list.

It strikes me as the much more obvious reading. “Of the things you listed, these two don’t really bother me.”


[flagged]


This is a truly bizarre comment chain.

I read the original comment by ACCount37 in the same way Forbo and BolexNOLA did - that ACCount37 is fine with cooling towers or dams, but not with coal stacks. This is a fully reasonable interpretation, considering the comment they were responding to explicitly listed those 3 examples; had they not been so explicit, it might be more reasonable to interpret it as simply not having an opinion on items not listed, but that isn't the case.

And since you're so keen on pointing out that this is public: you don't come off looking very great. Might wanna work on that.


> This is a truly bizarre comment chain.

> And since you're so keen on pointing out that this is public: you don't come off looking very great. Might wanna work on that.

Please edit out personal swipes from comments on HN. The guidelines ask us all to aim for better than this.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


I'm the one who gets warned? It gets even more bizarre!


[flagged]


We need you to avoid perpetuating or escalating flamewars on HN. Energy/climate topics are among the most predictable flamebait topics, and as a longtime user we need to see you being circumspect and making your contributions de-escalatory rather than escalatory. We've had to ask you several times before respect the site's guidelines and purpose. Please try harder.


You and I can disagree about interpretation all day long but there’s no misinterpreting your incredibly condescending tone. Have a good rest of your Sunday man.


[flagged]


Call it what you want, either way it was rude and unnecessary.

As for your point: If that’s what he’s doing then he’s doing a piss poor job because several of us clearly heard an implied “but not coal fire plant smoke stacks” while he said infrastructure for renewables on the skyline can be pretty.


Reputation laundering?


They have a much better reputation that most companies. I think they're doing okay compared to google, facebook, oracle, etc. Few people are going to think a corp is "doing good" but reputation does still matter somewhat.


If more people read the cases against Apple by the DOJ & the EU, they probably wouldn't have such a high opinion of Apple.


What’s there to launder? Perhaps they shouldn’t have as good a reputation as they do, but you can’t deny they do have a good reputation.


Reputation of what? They are just an office appliance company.


You're confusing your opinion of the company with the perception by the general public. Apple's definitely not perceived as 'an office appliance company' by your average person. It's considered a high-end luxury brand by many[1].

1: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361238549_Consumer_...


I think you mean high-tech brand, which the linked article affirms.


I think their public sales data shows Apple sells mainly to consumers, and mainly iPhones at that.

Like 1980s SONY, they are the top of the line consumer electronics giant of the time. The iPhone is even more successful than the Walkman or Trinitron TVs.

They also sell the most popular laptops,to consumers as well as corporate. Like SONY’s VAIO but more popular again.


The move in consumer electronics leadership from Japan to the US, Korea, and now China is probably pretty interesting to understand.

Can anyone recommend a good book or article about this?


Ah, I see where we went wrong here, you never specified that you meant reputation in your mind only. FYI, “reputation” is usually considered to be related to a general public opinion, not your personal one.


Edit: I mistook the bsky.sh domain, my bad. Can't get strike through to work for the life of me. I give up.

~~Bluesky blocked in Mississippi, try to work around it, only for the resource that tells you how to do this to be hosted on Bluesky, which is blocked. That's... suboptimal~~.

I can't help but feel like Bluesky is just three corporations in a trenchcoat pretending to be an open federated ecosystem.


Bluesky is just one corporation in a trenchcoat.


Sounds like a failure to properly build a threat model. Consider relocating your instance and begin using privacy mitigations like VPN.

Much cheaper than an attorney.


In theory, but is that actually the case today? I couldn't find any information about the current state of federation for Bluesky.

Contrast this with Mastodon which already has a vibrant federated ecosystem.


Yes, it is the case today. Its not a huge proportion, but there are thousands on external servers, and we recently had a nice sized migration to blacksky


If it is decentralized then a ban in a US state would have no impact. Did not know about blacksky though. That is at least -some- progress.


A.K.A. Axon Enterprises. Some OUI databases have the new name, some have the old.


Direct action against manufacturers. You don't have to be a wizard to cast fireball.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: